RESUMO
BackgroundIn the absence of evidence-based therapies for Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C), we aimed to describe the similarities and differences in the evaluation and treatment of MIS-C at hospitals in the United States. MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey from June 16 to July 16, 2020 of U.S. childrens hospitals regarding protocols for patients with MIS-C. Elements included hospital characteristics, clinical definition of MIS-C, evaluation, treatment, and follow-up. We summarized key findings and compared results from centers that had treated >5 patients vs. those that had treated [≤]5 patients. ResultsForty centers of varying size and experience with MIS-C participated. About half (21/40) of centers required only 1 day of fever for MIS-C to be considered. In the evaluation of patients, there was often a tiered approach. Intravenous immunoglobulin was the most widely used medication to treat MIS-C (98% of centers). Corticosteroids were listed in 93% of protocols for primarily the moderate or severe cases. Aspirin was commonly used including for mild cases, whereas heparin or low molecular weight heparin were used primarily in severe cases. In severe cases, anakinra and vasopressors were frequently recommended. Nearly all centers (39/40) recommended follow up with cardiology. There were similar findings between centers that had treated >5 patients vs. those that had treated [≤]5 patients. A supplement containing hospital protocols is provided. ConclusionThere are many similarities yet some key differences between hospital protocols for MIS-C. These findings can help healthcare providers learn from others regarding options for managing MIS-C patients. Article SummaryThis survey of U.S. hospitals highlights the interhospital similarities and differences in management of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children. Whats Known on This SubjectMIS-C is a novel and life-threatening disease in children associated with COVID-19. Early cases were treated with immunomodulatory agents similar to current guidelines for Kawasaki disease. There are currently no evidence-based guidelines for treatment of MIS-C. What This Study AddsThis study describes the protocolized evaluation and treatment of children with MIS-C at 40 hospitals in the U.S. These findings can help other hospitals create protocols to care for these children at their centers.
RESUMO
ObjectivesWe aimed to measure SARS-CoV-2 serologic responses in children hospitalized with multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS-C) compared to COVID-19, Kawasaki Disease (KD) and other hospitalized pediatric controls. MethodsFrom March 17, 2020 - May 26, 2020, we prospectively identified hospitalized children at Childrens Healthcare of Atlanta with MIS-C (n=10), symptomatic PCR-confirmed COVID-19 (n=10), KD (n=5), and hospitalized controls (n=4). With IRB approval, we obtained prospective and residual blood samples from these children and measured SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) receptor binding domain (RBD) IgM and IgG binding antibodies by quantitative ELISA and SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies by live-virus focus reduction neutralization assay. We statistically compared the log-transformed antibody titers among groups and performed correlation analyses using linear regression. ResultsAll children with MIS-C had high titers of SARS-CoV-2 RBD IgG antibodies, which correlated strongly with neutralizing antibodies (R2=0.667, P<0.001). Children with MIS-C had significantly higher SARS-CoV-2 RBD IgG antibody titers (geometric mean titer [GMT] 6800, 95%CI 3495-13231) than children with COVID-19 (GMT 626, 95%CI 251-1563, P<0.001), children with KD (GMT 124, 95%CI 91-170, P<0.001) and other hospitalized pediatric controls (GMT 85 [all below assay limit of detection], P<0.001). All children with MIS-C also had detectable RBD IgM antibodies, indicating recent SARS-CoV-2 infection. RBD IgG titers correlated with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (R2=0.512, P<0.046) and with hospital and ICU lengths of stay (R2=0.590, P=0.010). ConclusionQuantitative SARS-CoV-2 RBD antibody titers may have a role in establishing the diagnosis of MIS-C, distinguishing it from other similar clinical entities, and stratifying risk for adverse outcomes. Table of Contents SummaryChildren with MIS-C have high antibody titers to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor binding domain, which correlate with neutralization, systemic inflammation, and clinical outcomes. Whats Known on This SubjectAlthough the clinical features of a multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) associated with COVID-19 have been recently described, the serologic features of MIS-C are unknown. What This Study AddsIn this case series, all hospitalized children with MIS-C had significantly higher SARS-CoV-2 binding and neutralizing antibodies than children with COVID-19 or Kawasaki Disease. SARS-CoV-2 antibodies correlated with metrics of systemic inflammation and clinical outcomes, suggesting diagnostic and prognostic value.
